IDEALS OF STUDENTS WITH DIFFERENT LEVELS OF PERSONAL MATURITY
Abstract
The article discusses various approaches to the study of the ideals of the individual, their formation, the mechanisms of action of ideals on the formation of the individual, in particular, in the issue of the development of personal maturity, are considered. The purpose of the article is to describe and analyze the results of the study of the ideals of students with different levels of personal maturity. To achieve the goal, a study of the ideals and personal maturity of 99 first-year students of various areas of training at the age of 18 – 19 was organized on the basis of the Altai State Pedagogical University. As methods of research of the ideals of the personality of students were used unfinished sentences, content analysis of mini-essays (“Ideal Lifestyle”, “Ideal Profession”, “Ideal Person”) and the method of semantic differential by V. F. Petrenko. The personal maturity of the subjects was measured using a test-questionnaire of personal maturity edited by Yu. Z. Gilbukh. The results of the study showed that students with different levels of personal maturity ideals have a number of features. In particular, those with a satisfactory level of personal maturity ideals are characterized by humanity, self-development, self-realization. At a low (unsatisfactory) level, ideals are more hedonistic. The applied value of the study for the psychological counseling of students is presented.
About the Authors
O. G. Kholodkova
Altai State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kholodkova Olga G., PhD (Psychology), Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Psychology, Director of the Institute of Psychology and Pedagogy
Barnaul
L. S. Kolmogorova
Altai State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kolmogorova Lyudmila S., Dr. Sc. (Psychology), Professor, Professor at the Department of Psychology
Barnaul
S. S. Zhdanov
Altai State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Zhdanov Sergey S., Master’s Student at the Program "Psychological Counseling"
Barnaul
References
1. Asmolov A. G. Psixologiya lichnosti: principy` obshhepsixologicheskogo analiza. M. : Akademiya, 2002. 416 s.
2. Bozhovich L. I. Lichnost` i ee formirovanie v detskom vozraste. SPb. : Piter, 2008. 398 s.
3. Bratus` B. S. Anomalii lichnosti. M. : My`sl`, 1988. 301 s.
4. Bratus` B. S. Obshhepsixologicheskaya teoriya deyatel`nosti i problema edinicz analiza lichnosti // A. N. Leont`ev i sovremennaya psixologiya / pod red. A. V. Zapo-rozhcza. M., 1983. S. 212–219.
5. Gal`perin P. Ya. Vvedenie v psixologiyu : ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov / red., predisl. i komment. A. I. Podol`skogo. M. : Vy`ssh. shk. : Universitet, 2002. 330 s.
6. Karpinskij K. V. Psixologiya smy`slozhiznennogo krizisa : monografiya. Grodno : Izd-vo GrGU, 2019. 623 s.
7. Leont`ev D. A. Ocherk psixologii lichnosti. M. : Smy`sl, 1993. 43 s.
8. Nartova-Bochaver S. K. Psixologicheskaya suverennost` kak kriterij lichnostnoj zrelosti // Fenomen i kategoriya zrelosti v psixologii / pod red. A. L. Zhuravleva, E. A. Sergienko. M. : Institut psixologii RAN, 2007. C. 149–173.
9. Petrenko V. F. Osnovy` psixosemantiki. M. : E`ksmo, 2010. 480 s.
10. Psixologiya smy`sla zhizni: shkola V. E`. Chudnovskogo : kollektiv. monogr. / pod red. T. A. Popovoj, N. L. Karpovoj, G. A. Vajzer, K. V. Karpinskogo. M. : Smy`sl, 2021. 676 s.
11. Rean A. A. Psixologiya lichnosti. Socializaciya. Povedenie. Obshhenie. SPb. : Prajm-Evroznak, 2007. 407 s.
12. Rubinshtejn S. L. Osnovy` obshhej psixologii. SPb. : PITER, 2022. 720 s.
13. Rubinshtejn S. L. Problemy` obshhej psixologii. M. : Pedagogika, 1976. 416 s.
14. Slobodchikov V. I., Isaev E. S. Psixologiya cheloveka: Vvedenie v psixologiyu sub``ektivnosti : ucheb. posobie. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. M. : Izd-vo PSTGU, 2013. 360 s.
15. Stolin V. V. Samosoznanie lichnosti. M. : Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1983. 284 s.
16. Sudakov N. I. Nravstvenny`j ideal i formirovanie lichnosti shkol`nika // Voprosy` psixologii. 1973. № 3. S. 104–113.
17. Test-oprosnik lichnostnoj zrelosti : broshyura / red. Yu. Z. Gil`bux. Kiev : Psixodiagnostika i differencirovannoe obuchenie, 1994. 24 s.
18. Fel`dshtejn D. I. Psixologo-pedagogicheskie problemy` postroeniya novoj shkoly` v usloviyax znachimy`x izmenenij rebenka i situacii ego razvitiya // Vestnik praktich-eskoj psixologii obrazovaniya. 2010. № 2 (23). S. 12–18.
19. Holodkova O. G., Chernikova E. A. Cennostnoe otnoshenie k zhizni u studentov s razlichnoj professional`noj napravlennost`yu // Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P. G. Demidova. Seriya: Gumanitarny`e nauki. 2019. № 1 (47). S. 93–96.
20. Chudnovskij V. E`. Nravstvennaya ustojchivost` lichnosti: Psixologicheskoe issledovanie. M. : Pedagogika, 1981. 208 s.
21. Shmelev A. G. Vvedenie v e`ksperimental`nuyu psixosemantiku: teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovaniya i psixodiagnosticheskie vozmozhnosti. M. : Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1983. 158 s.
22. Yakobson S. G. Psixologicheskie problemy` e`ticheskogo razvitiya detej. M. : Pedagogika, 1984. 143 s.
23. Yan`shin P. V. Praktikum po klinicheskoj psixologii. Metody` issledovaniya lichnosti. SPb. : Piter, 2004. 336 s.
24. Allport G. W. Becoming: Basic Considerations for a Psychology of Personality The Terry Lectures Series (T. 20). Yale University Press, 1955. P. 106.
25. Edwards C. P. Culture and the construction of moral values: acomparative ethnography of moral encounters in two cultural settings // The emergence of morality in young children. Chicago ; London, 1987. P. 123–151.
26. Fromm E. Man for Himself: An Inquiry into the Psychology of Ethics. London, 2020. P. 224.
Review
For citations:
Kholodkova O.G., Kolmogorova L.S., Zhdanov S.S. IDEALS OF STUDENTS WITH DIFFERENT LEVELS OF PERSONAL MATURITY. Bulletin of Vladimir State University named after A.G. and N.G. Stoletovs. Series: Pedagogical and Psychological Sciences. 2023;(55):132-144. (In Russ.)
Views:
21
Email this article 